I was curious about the new rules implementation. Specifically, the one on the -1 to hit for small arms firing while moving. We all know from this forum that a previous version of the update tried was "-1 to hit for small arms firing at targets in cover"
I woul like, if possible, to get some insights and comments from Warwick / Piers / Design team about what factors & drivers were taken into account in order to take the decision towards the moving penalty instead of the cover penalty.
I have no opinion on this, just curious about the design & testing process, and the drivers that were behind that decision.
I love BG beyond all logical reason, and any further insight into the rules design is a real treasure.
Thanks a lot!!
You may be Powermonger, but I´m Powerowner